Turning Cheek

In the latest issue of Themelios, David VanDrunen offers a Reformed two-kingdoms interpretation of Matthew 5:38–42. After some careful exegesis that helps set up just why the church is not a work in retributive justice but rather a ministry of restorative reconciliation, he very helpfully defines a two-kingdoms approach to Matthew 5:38–42 and then shows how it contrasts to Lutheran, Neo-Calvinist or Transformationalist outlooks.

But one of the more interesting applications was in the very end concerning state action against the church. While he clearly recognizes the apostolic example to appeal to civil government “to abide by its own laws,” the accent seems placed upon the fact that “[T]he apostles…never retaliated when government officials treated them unjustly and never pursued legal action against those who persecuted them.” This brought to mind an example Stellman offers in his Dual Citizens when making the general point that voluntarily relinquishing rights (instead of clamoring for them) is in better service of boastworthy suffering for citizens of the New Covenant:

Here is a trickier example: if your legal right to practice your faith is in danger of being compromised, what should you do?  If you Google the phrase “law firms protecting Christians’ rights,” you’ll get myriad matches, and there’s no rule that prohibits you from taking to court anyone who infringes your right to pray or read Scripture wherever you want (within reason, of course).  There is something inconsistent, however, about Christians fighting for their faith by means of the sword of the U.S. justice system.  Would it not be far more Christ-like to patiently endure when we are wronged, as the writer to the Hebrews makes clear?

“But recall the former days in which, after you were illuminated, you endured a great struggle with sufferings: partly while you were made a spectacle both by reproaches and tribulations, and partly while you became companions of those who were so treated; for you had compassion on me in my chains, and joyfully accepted the plundering of your goods, knowing that you have a better and an enduring possession for yourselves in heaven. Therefore, do not cast away your confidence, which has great reward” (10:32-35).

This entry was posted in David VanDrunen, Two-kingdoms. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Turning Cheek

  1. sean says:

    Interesting article. One aspect he didn’t specifically illuminate and is an ever important always present 2k reality is that on a cultic level this common grace world always houses the realm of anti-christ. As such, assailing by even legitimate God sanctioned institutions is to be expected as manifestations of this anti-christ strain. i.e. the emperor’s cult.

  2. John Yeazel says:

    Interesting and insightful article- my interest lies in the distinctions between the Reformed and Lutheran understanding and application of 2K theology in the Church. Lutherans, the author notes, delegate all Law applications (in regards to discipline) to the State while the Reformed exercise the use of the Law to Church when they enforce church discipline. Am I reading the author right here? I am assuming the author thinks the Lutherans do not use the Law to enforce church discipline or delegate that responsibility to the State.

    I am going to try to hash this out in how the reformed and Lutherans would seek to apply this with what Paul states in the letter to the Corinthians. Paul says not to associate with those who call themselves brothers yet commit the following sins: 1) sexual immorality; 2) Greed; 3) Idolatry; 4) Reviler; 5) Drunkard; 6) Swindler (I Cor. 5). I am assuming that “do not associate” means to excommunicate them- to put them under church discipline. I am also assuming you would use the tactics used in Mathew 18 before enforcing the discipline. The purpose being always to reconcile the person to Christ and His Church.

    However, Paul seems to state, to still associate with those who commit these sins “in the world.” This would curb the Neo-Calvinist transformationalist desire to overtake the cultural institutions as part of their understanding of the cultural mandate.

    The problem lies in the fact that I do not see this kind of stuff happening in any Church’s I have ever attended. Turning the cheek seems like an even more impossible task even for redeemed sinners.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s