This is ironic…that someone who is so adamant against anything that smacks of similarity to a “Lutheran” scheme is so sympathetic to a movement that embraces baptismal regeneration and the possibility of losing one’s justification/regeneration.
This is how we know that sola fide and the Law/Gospel distinction is of principal importance. Those Federal Visionistas, they love them some Baptismal Regeneration and covenantal nomism (get in sola fide, stay in sola fidelity). So why are they not flocking to LCMS and WELS churches, but to Rome and the East? Because FV agrees with us that a church’s position on Law/Gospel trumps any lesser considerations. The neonomians absolutely can’t abide a Law/Gospel distinction, and we absolutely can’t do without it.